Legal Opinion

Andresen v. Intepros Federal, Inc

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 12, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2015-0446Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JENSINE ANDRESEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-446 (EGS) INTEPROS FEDERAL, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Dr. Jensine Andresen (“Dr. Andresen”), proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant IntePros Federal, Inc. (“IntePros”). Dr. Andresen asserts various federal claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq.; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.; the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”),…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API