Legal Opinion
Isip v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 2007No. B192382PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
In this action for breach of written and implied warranties in the sale of a car, defendant and appellant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), appeals from a judgment following a jury trial in favor of plaintiff and respondent Marisa Isip (Isip) in the amount of $20,000. MBUSA contends the trial court erred by refusing its proposed jury instruction on the implied warranty of merchantability. We conclude there was no instructional error and affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 21, 2004, Isip purchased a 2004 Mercedes-Benz C320 from a Mercedes-Benz…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- National Medical Transportation Network v. Deloitte & ToucheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Atkinson v. Elk Corp. of TexasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.