National Medical Transportation Network v. Deloitte & Touche
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Defendants Deloitte & Touche and Gordon Johns appeal a judgment after jury trial favoring plaintiff National Medical Transportation Network (Medtrans) on its claims for professional negligence, breach of contract and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. Defendants claim instructional errors, evidentiary error and the lack of substantial evidentiary support for various jury findings. Finding instructional errors plus insufficient evidence of causation, we reverse the judgment.
I
Introduction
Seeking to obtain capital contributions by investors, Medtrans…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BerrymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- US Ecology, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Isip v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cellars v. Pacific Coast Packaging, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Barksdale v. WilkowskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.