Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Elk Corp. of Texas
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 2006No. H028933PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
In this second appeal between these two parties we are asked to decide if roofing shingles purchased by Pacific Coast Roofing (hereinafter Pacific) pursuant to a contract to reroof an existing dwelling for James Atkinson are consumer goods under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty — Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Pub.L. No. 93-637 (Jan. 4, 1975) 88 Stat. 2183; 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.) (hereinafter Magnuson-Moss). In addition, we must decide whether Atkinson’s claim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under Magnuson-Moss is barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Miller v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Tietsworth v. SearsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.