Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1998No. 95-1320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

In granting the writ of mandamus, the appellate court determined that the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in failing to award wage-loss compensation to Williams-Laker. Therefore, we must determine whether the appellate court’s issuance of the writ was proper.

This is a case of first impression: whether an employee injured at work can receive wage-loss compensation for time missed for medical treatments pertaining to the workplace injury.

There are two types of workers’ compensation benefits involved in this case— medical benefits (R.C. 4123.54), which the commission approved and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Savage v. Claussner Hosiery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Chora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Rizer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking Cty. Dept. of Human Serv.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API