Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking Cty. Dept. of Human Serv.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1998No. 1995-2057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 227.] THE STATE EX REL. FREDERICK, APPELLANT, v. LICKING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking Cty. Dept. of Human Serv.,

1998-Ohio-378.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission’s order denying claimant’s application for R.C. 4123.56(B) wage loss compensation not an abuse of discretion when wage loss not caused by claimant’s industrial injury. (No. 95-2057—Submitted May 27, 1998—Decided June 24, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Chora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Brush Wellman. v. Moomey, 06ap-886 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Smegal v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Stafford v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API