Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1998No. 1995-1320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 694.] THE STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS-LAKER, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Indus. Comm.,

1998-Ohio-169.] Workers’ compensation—Claimant may recover wage-loss compensation for time absent from work, when. (No. 95-1320—Submitted October 20, 1997—Decided January 14, 1998.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD05-709. __________________ {¶ 1} On July 13, 1989, appellant and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API