Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rizer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2000No. 98-697PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause presents four questions for our review. First, should Rizer be denied W/L from March 2, 1994 until May 8, 1994, for the reason that this period precedes her amended application by more than two years? Second, should Rizer be denied W/L from May 9, 1994 through August 31, 1994, for the reason that she had no medical restrictions preventing her from working full-time? Third, did Rizer qualify for W/L while she was working part-time work at the Riser Foods grocery? And fourth, should Rizer be denied W/L from December 18, 1995 until June 6, 1996, because she quit her job at the grocery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dent v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ball v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Sands v. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State Ex Rel. Martishius v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-581 (7-12-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Johnson Controls v. Montez, 07ap-510 (6-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Morrow v. Cyclones Hockey Club, L.P., 06ap-1098 (9-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API