Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2000No. 1998-0697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1.] THE STATE EX REL. RIZER, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.,

2000-Ohio-257.] Workers’ compensation—Mandamus sought ordering Industrial Commission to vacate its denial of claimant’s application for wage-loss compensation— Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. (No. 98-697—Submitted October 12, 1999—Decided February 9, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD10-1309. __________________ {¶…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dent v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-498 (3-10-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Republic Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API