Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-120PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges both the commission’s award of wage loss compensation and the commission’s computation of claimant’s AWW. Our review reveals that the commission’s order was based in part on an abuse of discretion and, accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Effective August 22, 1986, R.C. 4123.56(B) states:

“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the claimant’s physical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Wireman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Chora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Reamer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API