Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 94-2459PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 4123.56(B) provides:

“Where an employee in a claim allowed under this chapter suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”

Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) provides:

“In injury claims in which the date of injury * * * is on or after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rizer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Reamer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Oldaker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API