Legal Opinion
Ashflash Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided March 30, 1976No. C.D. 4643 Court Nos. 69/43133, etcPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge:
The issue in these 36 protests, consolidated pursuant to defendant’s motion, concerns the proper tariff classification of certain “blinker lanterns”, which were imported from Hong Kong during the years 1967 through 1970 and entered at the ports of New York and Los Angeles.
The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 13.75 per centum ad valorem under item 683.80 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Plaintiff claims that the imports are properly dutiable under item 688.40, TSUS, as modified by T.D. 68-9. The applicable rate of duty under item 688.-40 pursuant to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Oxford International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Fedtro, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Carling Electric Co., (Carlingswitch, Inc.) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- ASEA, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Sanyo Electric Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.