Legal Opinion

Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 5, 1978No. C.D. 4764; Court No. 72-7-01676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Hong Kong. The merchandise, described on the customs invoices as “bicycle radios complete with accessories,” consists of a radio-headlight in a common housing, batteries, a lock and mounting bracket.

Each component was separately classified by the customs officials. The only portion of the classification contested by the plaintiff, and thus the only issue before this court, is the correctness of the classification of the radio-headlight…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Englishtown Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  5. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clipper Belt Lacer Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  2. American Schack Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
  3. Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  4. Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API