Legal Opinion

ASEA, INC. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 29, 1984No. Court 80-4-00585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNARD NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

Introduction

Plaintiff challenges the classification by the Customs Service of four shunt reactors imported from Sweden in 1978.

The District Director at the port of Duluth, Minnesota classified the imports under the provision for “inductors” in item 682.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) and assessed duty at the rate of 7.5 per centum ad valorem. ASEA, Inc. (the importer) claims that the shunt reactors are “more than” inductors and are properly dutiable under the provision in item 688.40, TSUS for “[e]lectrical articles, and the electrical parts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Esco Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. Oxford International Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. Acec Electric Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Asea, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. A & A International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Asea, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. A & a Intern., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. Eastalco Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API