Janex Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge:
This action presents a classic instance for the appropriate utilization of a summary judgment — the procedural remedy which obviates protracted, expensive and unnecessary litigation where there is no justiciable question of fact.
The within case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to rule 8.2. Presented for determination is the proper tariff classification for certain articles described on the invoices as “Eaggedy Ann Nite Timers” and “Eaggedy Andy Nite Timers”, imported from Hong Kong through the port of New York in 1976.
*147The three entries involved…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Kaufman & Vlnson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Englishtown Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clairol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- G.G. Marck & Assocs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- House of Ideas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.