Legal Opinion
E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 18, 1971No. 5422, C.A.D. 1032PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almond, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division,1 overruling appllant’s protest and holding that the imported merchandise had been properly classified by the collector of customs. The merchandise, invoiced as: “Type 25 Economiser Pipes 12 Ft. long,” was classified under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, as-other articles in chief value of iron, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem.
Appellant claims that the imported merchandise is properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Baker Ice Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Green Fuel Economizer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- E. Green & Son (New York.), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3Cited by46 opinions
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Nidec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.