Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-1222PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The sole substantive issue presented by this appeal is whether the exclusionary rule applies to parole revocation proceedings.

I

However, before reaching the exclusionary rule issue, we will consider a matter which has not been raised by the parties — whether the order appealed from was a final appealable order.

Under Section 2(B)(2)(a), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, appeals may be taken to the Supreme Court as a matter of right in cases originating in the courts of appeals, including actions on extraordinary writs. R.C. 2505.03 restricts the appellate jurisdiction of any court, including…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Alford v. WintersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API