Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 1996-1545PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 543.] THE STATE EX REL. WHITE ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, APPELLANT AND CROSS- APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.,

1997-Ohio-366.] Mandamus—Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to consider merits of appeal and cross-appeal where court of appeals’ entry issuing a writ of mandamus neither determined the action nor prevented a judgment—R.C. 2505.02, construed and applied. (No. 96-1545—Submitted July 7, 1997—Decided October 1, 1997.)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Downs v. PaniotoOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Farmers Market Drive-In Shopping Ctrs. v. Magana, 06ap-532 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Leasure v. Adena Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State ex rel. O'Malley v. Russo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API