Legal Opinion

Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1989No. 88-53PublishedCited by 389 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue the parties present is whether a corporate officer not authorized to practice law has the authority to file a notice of appeal on behalf of the corporation.

While this presents an issue of first impression in this state which this court at some point should decide, we decline to do so in this case because we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal on that issue.

The question of our jurisdiction to hear this appeal was not raised or briefed by any party. Nevertheless, we raise it on our own motion.

The jurisdictional issue in this case provides us with a perfect vehicle to speak about an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pokorny v. Tilby Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. General Electric Supply Co. v. Warden Electric, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by389 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wisintainer v. Elcen Power Strut Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

384 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API