Rogers v. County Bank of Santa Cruz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting the motion of defendants to quash service of summons upon them on the ground of lack of jurisdiction based upon plaintiff’s noneomplianee with Code of Civil Procedure section 830. The sole issue which this appeal poses is whether the posting of a cash deposit with the clerk of the trial court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1054a 2 satisfies the undertaking required by section 830 in a libel action.
' .Upon the filing of the instant action for libel and interference with contract and economic advantage plaintiff deposited $500 cash security…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Fielding v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Wemyss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. StranskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Modesto Irrigation District v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palmer v. AgeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Garrick v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971