Legal Opinion

Modesto Irrigation District v. City of Modesto

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1962No. Civ. 150PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J.—

The Modesto Irrigation District has appealed from a judgment in declaratory relief holding valid a City of Modesto ordinance regulating the location of overhead utilities and denying an injunction to permanently enjoin the city from enforcing said ordinance.

District, plaintiff and appellant herein, is engaged in the business of transmitting, distributing and selling electric power pursuant to specific statutory authorization embodied in the Water Code of California, division 11, part 5, chapter 1, article 3, sections 22115 et seq. The city ordinance in question, requiring the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Palmer v. AgeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. City of Lafayette v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. StiltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API