Brandt v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The basic problem here involved is whether a corporate bond can be filed as security in a libel and slander action. The filing of such a bond, in our opinion, complies with the statutory requirements. Therefore, the requested writ should issue. .
The problem arises under the following circumstances. Petitioner Brandt filed an action in respondent court against real parties in interest seeking damages, an injunction, and declaratory relief. The complaint stated causes of action for unfair competition, breach of contract, and libel and slander. To satisfy the requirements of section 830 of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Shively v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Hagan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wemyss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- County of Santa Clara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lara v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
- Arenas v. Shed Media U.S. Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.