Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. Stransky
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an appeal by defendant, Malcolm Stransky, from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Sequoia Vacuum Systems and Arthur C. White, in an action for unfair competition and breach of fiduciary duty. Appellant Stransky and the other defendants were charged with certain concealed activities on behalf of respondents' competitor, defendant Beamco. The complaint, charging violations of fiduciary duties and certain trade secrets, prayed for an injunction restraining appellant and other defendants from continuing to compete and for compensatory and punitive damages.
The trial court found that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Devers v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Wilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hudson v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.