Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Agee

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1978No. Civ. 16506PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARELSON, J. *

Defendants are residents of Lake Jennings Mobile Home Park in Lakeside, California. Plaintiffs are the owners (since April 1, 1972) of the park and are landlords of the defendants. All the leases in existence at the time plaintiffs purchased the park were set to expire on March 31, 1973.

Plaintiffs informed defendants on October 26, 1972, that they planned to increase the rent paid by the tenants in order to cover the increased costs of operation. Any increase in rent would not go into effect until the expiration of the leases then in existence.

On December 8, 1972,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Maben v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Young v. HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API