Legal Opinion
Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1971No. Civ. 26787PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (H. C.), J.
Goodrich Tire Company, after paying a judgment, appeals from the denial of its motion to compel the codefendant, Perry & Whitelaw, Inc., to contribute its share of the judgment.
The action was for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs (hereinafter Barth) in an automobile accident caused by a blowout of a tire on the station wagon in which they were riding. The tire was manufactured by defendant-appellant, Goodrich Tire Co. (Goodrich) and placed on the Barth station wagon by respondent, Perry & Whitelaw, Inc. (P & W), a tire distributor for Goodrich. The trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Pearson Ford Co. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Salaman v. BoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Winzler & Kelly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.