Legal Opinion

Knight v. Gosselin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1932No. Docket No. 4378PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

The plaintiffs procured separate judgments in consolidated actions for damages against the defendants, Gosselin, Andrew Poscie and Prank Poscie, as joint tort-feasors, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile casualty. These judgments were rendered pursuant to verdicts which were found by a jury. The causes were dismissed as to other defendants. A new trial was granted to the defendants Andrew and Prank Poscie at their request. The original judgment against the defendant Gosselin became final. In a subsequent trial upon the same pleadings in which they were joined…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Rocca v. SteinmetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rankin v. Central Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Brockett v. Kitchen Boyd Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Fuller v. Standard Stations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Graham v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of BostonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API