Legal Opinion
In Re the Conditional Use Permit Denied to Meier
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*524JOHNS, Circuit Judge
[¶ 1.] Mark Meier (Meier) appeals a circuit court judgment affirming the actions of the Aurora County Board of Commissioners, sitting as the Board of Adjustment (Board), in denying his application for a conditional use permit. By notice of review the Board challenges the constitutionality of SDCL 7-8-30. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
[¶ 2.] In December 1997, Aurora County farmer Mark Meier applied to the Board for a conditional use permit allowing the construction of two hog confinement facilities housing approximately 6,600 pigs. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- East Manchester Township Zoning Hearing Board v. DallmeyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Goos RV Center v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Approval of Request for Amendment to Frawley Planned Unit DevelopmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Surat Farms, LLC v. Brule County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Hanson v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.