Surat Farms, LLC v. Brule County Board of Commissioners
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice
[111.] Albert Delany filed a drainage complaint with Brule County alleging that Surat Farms LLC (Surat) was partially blocking drainage of an intermittent watercourse. Delany contended that the blockage caused water to back up onto his adjacent property. The Brule County Board of Commissioners (Board) held a hearing and found that Surat impermissi-bly altered the watercourse. Surat appealed the Board’s decision, and the circuit court, after de novo review, affirmed. Surat appeals. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶2.] Delany and Surat own adjacent farmland located near the Bijou Hills…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dunker v. Brown County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zwart v. PenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Carmody v. Lake County Bd. of Commn'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Matter of Drainage Permit of McAreaveySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Andersen v. AndersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Andersen v. AndersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.