Hanson v. Minnehaha County Commission
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Appellants Doug and Louise Hanson appeal from a de novo circuit court decision upholding the approval of a conditional use permit applied for by Eastern Farmers Cooperative. On appeal to this Court, the Hansons assert that the Minne-haha County Commission’s decision to uphold the approval of the permit was arbi trary and capricious and that ex parte communications between a commissioner and Eastern Farmers Cooperative violated the Hansons’ due process rights. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] Eastern Farmers Cooperative (EFC) applied for a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Adolph v. Grant County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Ehlebracht v. Deuel Cnty. Pln. Comm'n and Crowned Ridge Wind II, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Christenson v. Crowned Ridge Wind, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.