Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Minnehaha County Commission

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2014No. 26859, 26879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Appellants Doug and Louise Hanson appeal from a de novo circuit court decision upholding the approval of a conditional use permit applied for by Eastern Farmers Cooperative. On appeal to this Court, the Hansons assert that the Minne-haha County Commission’s decision to uphold the approval of the permit was arbi trary and capricious and that ex parte communications between a commissioner and Eastern Farmers Cooperative violated the Hansons’ due process rights. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] Eastern Farmers Cooperative (EFC) applied for a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lead Industries Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Adolph v. Grant County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Ehlebracht v. Deuel Cnty. Pln. Comm'n and Crowned Ridge Wind II, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Christenson v. Crowned Ridge Wind, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API