Haberer v. Rice
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McMURCHIE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is one of a continuing saga: Haberer v. First Bank of South Dakota, 429 N.W.2d 62 (S.D.1988) and Haberer v. Rice, 476 N.W.2d 276 (S.D.1991).
In Haberer v. First Bank, supra, this Court held that when the bank had earlier sued Haberer to foreclose on a note executed by Haberer and the bank, Haberer’s action against the bank for allegedly breaching an agreement to lend Haberer $150,000 was a compulsory counterclaim to the bank’s original action and could not be separately pursued. Summary judgment for the bank was affirmed because Haberer failed to raise his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- BASIC Food INDUSTRIES, INC v. GRANTMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Loretta Klump v. J. David Duffus, Jr., Law Offices of Dixon, Duffus & Doub, a Partnership, and Accident and Injury Referral ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.