Legal Opinion
South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1999No. 20531PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) appeals the circuit court’s decision affirming Department of Labor’s (Department) determination that both Casualty Reciprocal Exchange (CRE) and Dakota Truck Underwriters (DTU) established claims for reimbursement from SIF. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Two cases were combined for consideration because they involve similar facts and present the same legal issue.
Casualty Reciprocal Exchange/Niederman
[¶ 3.] Darlene Niederman was employed as a cook for Employer, Lumberyard Restaurant, Inc. On July 21, 1986, Niederman reported a work-related back…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Zoss v. SchaefersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Moeller v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Nickerson v. American States InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.