Hinds v. Clark
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a parcel of land situated in the city of Bakersfield, in Kern County. The case was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. Judgment was rendered for the defendant decreeing that plaintiff had no interest in the land and that the defendant was the owner thereof. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The complaint is in the usual form, and alleges the ownership and title of the plaintiff in the land, his continuous possession thereof until four years prior to the commencement of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Simmons v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dougery v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hossom v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Witter v. Bank of MilpitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.