Legal Opinion
People v. Lassen
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1906No. Docket No. 190PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to St. Clair; Law, J. Peter Lassen was convicted of violating the fish law and sentenced to pay a fine of $20 and costs.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The following is an agreed statement of the facts:
“On the 29th day of June, 1903, the respondent, purchased from one Hitchcock, a Canadian fisherman, 156 wall-eyed pike or pickerel, the whole number weighing 106 pounds. The- purchase was made in the Province of Ontario, in Canada, in the waters of which Province the fish were lawfully caught. Before the fish were purchased, respondent had made a contract to sell them to Prevor Brothers, Boston, Massachusetts. These fish, under the direction of respondent, were brought to his fishhouse on *598the banks of the St. Clair river, in the city of Port…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . Buffalo Fish Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Commonwealth v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- People v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- People v. O'NeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- White v. PentonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- People v. ZimbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. SetunskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.