Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Department of Conservation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1971No. Docket 7,365PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

The plaintiffs are commercial perch fishermen, who engaged in this business in the Saginaw Bay area. During the summer of 1965, officers of the State Conservation Department seized *183catches of perch taken by the fishermen. The basis for the seizure by the Conservation Department was that the plaintiffs had allegedly caught fish which were undersized, and therefore illegal, under the conservation laws of the State of Michigan. MCLA § 308.14(d) (Stat Ann 1967 Rev § 13.1505 [d]).

This litigation concerns plaintiffs’ suit brought in the court of claims seeking $6,000 in compensation for the fish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. People v. CollisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. ZimbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tallman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. AnthonyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Ball v. EX-CELL-O CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API