Legal Opinion

People v. Dornbos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Ottawa; Padgbam, J. Henry Dornbos and Gerrit Dornbos were convicted of a violation of tbe fish laws.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Respondents were charged with having in their possession, contrary to law, a large' number of lake trout, to wit, 300 pounds, each weighing less than impounds in the round. The complaint was made under the provisions of section 2, Act No. 88, Pub. Acts 1899. A trial was had before the justice, and respondents were convicted. An appeal was taken to the circuit court, and on a trial before a jury the respondents were again convicted. The case comes into this court on exceptions "before judgment.

The title of the act is :

“An act to amend sections one and two, and to add sections six and seven, of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Commonwealth v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. People v. AllenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Beacon Club v. Kalamazoo County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. AntkoviakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. ZimbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. LassenMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API