Legal Opinion

People v. O'Neil

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

■ Exceptions before judgment from tbe recorder’s court of Detroit; Cbapin, J. Thomas W. O’Neil and Jacob H. Hoffner were convicted of violating the game laws.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The exceptions before judgment are presented in two cases of the same title, which are heard upon one record, in the first of which the respondents are charged with selling brook trout on the 9th of September, 1895, and in the other of which they are charged with selling a quantity of quail on the 28th of October, 1895. The prosecutions are based on section 5 of Act No. 196, Pub. Acts 1893, and section 5a, added to the act in 1895 by Act No. 223.

The previous legislation upon the subject was considered by this court at the June term, 1888, in the case of People v. O’Neil, 71 Mich. 325. The act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. American Express Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Commonwealth v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. People v. O'NeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eager v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Express Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. People v. LassenMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. GillettoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. People v. SetunskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. PollockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API