Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Department of Conservation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1972No. 28 October Term 1971, Docket No. 53,165PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwainson, J.

Plaintiffs are commercial perch fishermen who pursue this occupation in the Saginaw Bay area. In the summer of 1965, officers of the Michigan Department of Conservation* seized certain catches of perch taken by the fishermen on the basis that the fish were undersize and, therefore, illegal under MCLA 308.14(d); MSA 13.1505(d).

Plaintiffs instituted suit in the Court of Claims seeking $6,000 in damages, alleging that the fish had been illegally confiscated by representatives of the state. Both parties moved for summary judgment, and the Court of Claims granted defendant’s motion *498for summary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Webster v. Rotary Electric Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Heckathorn v. HeckathornMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. CollisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Lamphere Schools v. Lamphere Federation of TeachersMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hiltz v. Phil's Quality MarketMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Girard v. WagenmakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API