Legal Opinion

People v. Zimberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1948No. Docket No. 68, Calendar No. 43,429PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Defendants were convicted of violating Act No. 84, § 14, Pub. Acts 1929 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 6320), as amended by Act No. 323, Pub. Acts 1945 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 6320, Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 13.1505), which reads in part as follows;

“It shall be unlawful to market, have in possession, transport or offer for sale * # * (i) pike-perch (yellow pickerel), of a less length than 15i- inches * * * Provided, That pike-perch (yellow pickerel) not less than 13 inches in length may be taken from Lake Erie: Provided further, That pike-perch (yellow pickerel) not less than 13 inches in length…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Townsend v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Magner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. TerrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API