Legal Opinion

Lothspeich v. Morrell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1933No. 24273. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Plaintiff, Larry Lothspeich, while riding as a guest of the defendant R. H. Morrell in the latter’s automobile, was injured, about dark one evening, in a collision between the automobile and a loaded truck operated by persons named Darnold and Richards, on a highway in Whitman county. A verdict was returned against Morrell and wife, and also against Darnold and Richards. Morrell and his wife moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, both of which were denied. Morrell and his wife have appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

The assignments of error present only the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Heiman v. KloiznerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Blood v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Craig v. McAteeWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Klopfenstein v. EadsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API