Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Kloizner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1926No. 19423. En BancPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Heiman, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by her as the result of the negligent driving by the defendant Kloizner of his automobile, while she was riding therein with him as his invited guest in the city of Seattle. A trial upon the merits before the court sitting without a jury resulted in findings and judgment awarding recovery to plain tiff in the snm of $1,300, from which the defendant has appealed to this court.

Appellant Kloizner is an unmarried man about…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Beard v. KlusmeierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cody v. VenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Roy v. KirnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Perozzi v. GaniereOregon Supreme Court · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API