Blood v. Austin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought against the • driver of an automobile and his wife, on account of his alleged negligence causing the death of an invited guest. • The trial court directed a verdict for the de fendants on the ground that it must be held, as a matter of law, that the evidence was insufficient to show gross negligence or wanton injury on the part of the driver. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment on the verdict.
Doctor O. B. Austin will be spoken of as the respondent. He and his wife invited Mr. and Mrs. Blood to join them in a trip from Aberdeen to Port Townsend and return, in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Heiman v. KloiznerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Klopfenstein v. EadsWashington Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.