Legal Opinion

Blood v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1928No. 21148. Department OnePublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought against the • driver of an automobile and his wife, on account of his alleged negligence causing the death of an invited guest. • The trial court directed a verdict for the de fendants on the ground that it must be held, as a matter of law, that the evidence was insufficient to show gross negligence or wanton injury on the part of the driver. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

Doctor O. B. Austin will be spoken of as the respondent. He and his wife invited Mr. and Mrs. Blood to join them in a trip from Aberdeen to Port Townsend and return, in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Heiman v. KloiznerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Klopfenstein v. EadsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API