Legal Opinion

Nist v. Tudor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1965No. 37227Published

1Opinion of the Court

67 Wn.2d 322 (1965)

407 P.2d 798

E.C. NIST et al., Appellants,

v.

ANTHONY J. TUDOR et al., Respondents.[*]

No. 37227.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 10, 1965.

John J. Keough (of Colvin & Williams), for appellants.

Arthur R. Hart (of Martin, Shorts & Bever), for respondents.

HALE, J.

The collision between a truck and automobile September 9, 1960, seriously injured Margaret L. Nist, jeopardized a friendship between neighbors, and impelled this court to make another study of gross negligence.

It was a bright summer morning when Margaret Nist set out with Crystal M. Tudor, her friend and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API