Legal Opinion · Dissent

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1933No. 24296. En BancPublished

1DissentSteinert, J.

(dissenting) — As stated in the majority opinion, this is a companion case to Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Seattle, ante p. 649, 21 P. (2d) 287. All but two of this appellant’s objections to the ordinance in question were disposed of in that case. My dissent in that case applies with equal force here. Since the majority opinion discusses and disposes of the two additional questions, my dissent is likewise extended, inasmuch as I disagree with the majority upon both questions.

The first question deals with appellant’s rights under its existing franchise. The appellant here already had a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Educational Films Corp. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1917
  5. Hot Springs Electric Light Co. v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API