Legal Opinion
Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1933No. 24296. En BancPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
This is a companion case to Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Seattle, ante p. 649, 21 Pac. (2d) 287, and, like that case, is here on appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the amended complaint had been sustained. The assignments of error are:
“(1) The court erred in sustaining respondent’s demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint.
“ (2) The court erred in dismissing appellant’s first cause of action.
“ (3) The court erred in dismissing appellant’s second cause of action.
“ (4) The court erred in failing to hold that the enforcement of the ordinance as to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Texas Company v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Sonitrol Northwest, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.