Legal Opinion

Klopfenstein v. Eads

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1927No. 20414. Department TwoPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

In May, 1925, John H. Murray, a traveling salesman, and whose administrator brought this action for damages on account of his death, employed the defendants Eads’ truck to convey his five or six sample trunks from Olympia to Shelton. An agreement was made between the parties as to the charge for the hauling. No arrangements were made whereby Mr. Murray was also to ride on the truck, but as it started from Olympia he asked the driver to stop, and he then got on the driver’s seat and thus continued on the trip to Shelton, the defendant Bailey, a servant of the defendants Eads, doing the driving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gruber v. Cater Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Miller v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API