Legal Opinion
Monson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1983No. 57867PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice:
The appeal presents two issues for our decision: [1] Does the Open Meeting Act apply to the Corporation Commission [Commission] when it is functioning in an adjudicative capacity? and [2] Is the Commission order here under review supported by substantial evidence? Our answer to the first question is in the negative and to the second in the affirmative.
The appellant [Monson] seeks corrective relief from the Commission’s order that authorizes the drilling of a salt water disposal well. The dispute arose when appellee, Ardmore Drilling Company [driller], filed an application with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.