Legal Opinion
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 4, 1995No. 83179PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
The Corporation Commission issued Order No. 380024 in Cause No. RM 930000090, and thereby promulgated rules that required telephone companies to upgrade their service, upgrade their networks, and provide lifeline service. The Order also provided for wide area calling plans. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) appealed, seeking review of the Order. SWBT then sought before the Commission a stay of the newly adopted rules pending the present appeal. The Commission denied the stay, and SWBT seeks a stay of the Order from this Court.
SWBT argues that the stay is mandatory…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- House of Realty, Inc. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Awad v. ZiriaxDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2013
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.