State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.
Harold Freeman and Ray C. Jones are presently serving as members of the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma. In an original proceeding, in the nature of quo warranto, filed in this Court, No. 42,709, the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, with the consent of the Governor of Oklahoma, seeks a judicial determination that certain acts committed by Harold Freeman, while a member of the Corporation Commission, constitute a forfeiture or vacation of his office as Corporation Commissioner. In an original proceeding, in the nature of quo warranto, filed in this Court,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Olender v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Franklin v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Ethics Commission v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- United States v. Charles Eldon Gould, United States of America v. Joseph Patrick CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.