Legal Opinion
Erro v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 1932No. Docket No. 8000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The plaintiffs seek by this action to have the proceedings of the city council of the City of Santa Barbara for the opening of an alleyway declared void and to restrain the defendants from taking further proceedings to that end. Plaintiffs had judgment and the defendants appeal upon typewritten transcripts.
The proceedings taken under the Street Opening Act were designed to declare public an existing private alley 20 feet in width and about 315 feet in length, commencing on the northeasterly line of Chapala Street in block 142 and running at right angles northeasterly to the end of lot 21. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cutting v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Wieczorek v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.