Legal Opinion

Cutting v. Vaughn

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1920No. S. F. No. 8000PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The facts upon which this appeal is based are stated in the opinion of the district court of appeal for the first appellate district, division one. We adopt that . opinion in part as follows:

“This is an appeal from a judgment'for defendants, entered after the granting of their motion for nonsuit, in an action wherein plaintiffs sued as the owners of certain lands lying to the north and northeast of Richmond Avenue in the city of Richmond; and the defendants are said city, its . councihnen, street superintendent, and treasurer, certain street improvement corporations and the John Nicholl…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hatton v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Clouse v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Independent Stock Farm v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API